Difference between revisions of "User talk:Simonlc"

From TetrisWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
I appreciate the work you're putting in for making Tetris-themed templates. Would it be possible to make ones for outdated pages and pages to be deleted? I know there are several that could use the template. [[User:Arcorann|Arcorann]] ([[User talk:Arcorann|talk]]) 17:43, 2 January 2019 (PST)
 
I appreciate the work you're putting in for making Tetris-themed templates. Would it be possible to make ones for outdated pages and pages to be deleted? I know there are several that could use the template. [[User:Arcorann|Arcorann]] ([[User talk:Arcorann|talk]]) 17:43, 2 January 2019 (PST)
 
:Thank you :) I can absolutely create those templates. I've done a bit of research on how other wikis handle deletion and outdated pages, the later is pretty straight forward, but deleting is usually quite complex. For TetrisWiki's purposes I think simply having a speedy deletion template is good enough for now. Speedy deletion is when a page should be deleted without discussion. Wikipedia uses this, as well as deletion proposal, which asks other contributors to discuss the proposed deletion. I don't think TetrisWiki is large enough, or has anything with actual content worth deleting right now. Let me know what you think. I think it's also worth making a [[TetrisWiki:Deletion]] page for instructions how we decided to handle such cases. Lastly, I've reached out to Myndzi about getting higher privileges so I can edit CSS, and other templates. I'll also ask about deleting pages, since I believe neither of us have that capability. --[[User:Simonlc|simonlc]] ([[User talk:Simonlc|talk]]) 22:46, 2 January 2019 (PST)
 
:Thank you :) I can absolutely create those templates. I've done a bit of research on how other wikis handle deletion and outdated pages, the later is pretty straight forward, but deleting is usually quite complex. For TetrisWiki's purposes I think simply having a speedy deletion template is good enough for now. Speedy deletion is when a page should be deleted without discussion. Wikipedia uses this, as well as deletion proposal, which asks other contributors to discuss the proposed deletion. I don't think TetrisWiki is large enough, or has anything with actual content worth deleting right now. Let me know what you think. I think it's also worth making a [[TetrisWiki:Deletion]] page for instructions how we decided to handle such cases. Lastly, I've reached out to Myndzi about getting higher privileges so I can edit CSS, and other templates. I'll also ask about deleting pages, since I believe neither of us have that capability. --[[User:Simonlc|simonlc]] ([[User talk:Simonlc|talk]]) 22:46, 2 January 2019 (PST)
 +
 +
== Unacceptable reverting ==
 +
 +
Reverting constructive edits is a vandalism, as it causes the inverse of what the constructive edit did. In [[SRS]] you spread misconception that it is acceptable to use a particular non-SRS kick. In [[Tetris Guideline]] you presented the official names in a confusing manner as color names, which is also vandalism. In [[Tetris]] and [[Glossary]] you made the pages outdated. This kind of vandalism is unacceptable. [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 06:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:30, 22 January 2020

Maintenance templates

I appreciate the work you're putting in for making Tetris-themed templates. Would it be possible to make ones for outdated pages and pages to be deleted? I know there are several that could use the template. Arcorann (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2019 (PST)

Thank you :) I can absolutely create those templates. I've done a bit of research on how other wikis handle deletion and outdated pages, the later is pretty straight forward, but deleting is usually quite complex. For TetrisWiki's purposes I think simply having a speedy deletion template is good enough for now. Speedy deletion is when a page should be deleted without discussion. Wikipedia uses this, as well as deletion proposal, which asks other contributors to discuss the proposed deletion. I don't think TetrisWiki is large enough, or has anything with actual content worth deleting right now. Let me know what you think. I think it's also worth making a TetrisWiki:Deletion page for instructions how we decided to handle such cases. Lastly, I've reached out to Myndzi about getting higher privileges so I can edit CSS, and other templates. I'll also ask about deleting pages, since I believe neither of us have that capability. --simonlc (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2019 (PST)

Unacceptable reverting

Reverting constructive edits is a vandalism, as it causes the inverse of what the constructive edit did. In SRS you spread misconception that it is acceptable to use a particular non-SRS kick. In Tetris Guideline you presented the official names in a confusing manner as color names, which is also vandalism. In Tetris and Glossary you made the pages outdated. This kind of vandalism is unacceptable. PiotrGrochowski (talk) 06:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)