Talk:Tetromino Per Time: Difference between revisions

From TetrisWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
Of which only the DTET author gave a passing mention of minutes.<br/>
Of which only the DTET author gave a passing mention of minutes.<br/>
Enough? Now go badger the other countless POVs, first-person writings, blatantly obvious and widely respected but unverified statements, etc etc etc which this wiki is peppered with.
Enough? Now go badger the other countless POVs, first-person writings, blatantly obvious and widely respected but unverified statements, etc etc etc which this wiki is peppered with.
:I'm not trying to be bitter, but it looks like you now have some citations to back up that statement. That's all I was really wanting to see. It makes those kind of tidbits far more interesting. [[User:72.150.62.175|72.150.62.175]] 08:26, 14 February 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 13:26, 14 February 2007

Removed text: It is the impression of the writer of this section that generally, games and players in Western cultures tend to prefer minutes while those of Japan prefer seconds as the base time unit. The impression of the writer is his point of view. This wiki speaks in neutral point of view. Please use specific examples when refering to "Western cultures" and Japan. Also, that alone does not represent a worldly view. That said, the only application of TPS I've encountered was in Heboris, and that hardly represents Japanese preference. It really only definitely shows the preference of one person (the author). 72.150.62.175 20:04, 12 February 2007 (EST)

Says the person who doesn't read Japanese at all.
*sigh*

TGM 2ch Thread Part 6, 33, 37, 22, 17, 20, 35, 28, Tetris DS Experts Thread Part 11, Koryan's Blog, Tetris Monkeys BBS, slappin' Beats 613 Blog, Kimen no P no Kibun Nikki blog, Dot Eater Blog, DTET Author Blog, Tetris Website information Ipepapi's blog.

Of which only the DTET author gave a passing mention of minutes.
Enough? Now go badger the other countless POVs, first-person writings, blatantly obvious and widely respected but unverified statements, etc etc etc which this wiki is peppered with.

I'm not trying to be bitter, but it looks like you now have some citations to back up that statement. That's all I was really wanting to see. It makes those kind of tidbits far more interesting. 72.150.62.175 08:26, 14 February 2007 (EST)