Talk:4-wide construction patterns: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Simonlc moved page Talk:Pattern Recognition to Talk:4-wide construction patterns: The page was never finished and this makes more sense for the current content, it's also still useful so not worth deleting.) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
i'm not sure what all of this means. could you detail what the article is about any? [[User:72.150.62.175|72.150.62.175]] 21:30, 17 February 2007 (EST) | i'm not sure what all of this means. could you detail what the article is about any? [[User:72.150.62.175|72.150.62.175]] 21:30, 17 February 2007 (EST) | ||
This is a work in progress that is not even close to being finished yet. Basically, I'm detailing construction patterns involving 3-celled wells, soon to include 4(this in no way seeks to exclude 5+ celled techniques, but rather complement them). This serves as a visual representation of what a player sees in their head while they are stacking. A fast player is often unaware of these images because they have acquired this skill through experience. It's purpose is to enable a player to see patterns in advance and the end result the moment they look at a playfield position and the upcoming next pieces. | |||
The two figures in each diagram are mirrors of each other. | The two figures in each diagram are mirrors of each other. | ||
The only rules so far: | The only rules so far: | ||
#No I pieces are to be used in any pattern. | |||
#The patterns only take duplicate next pieces into mind. (Triplets are implausible in modern randomizers) | |||
#No figures will lead to a 020 end pattern because that will force the usage of an I piece. | |||
#No soft dropping. | |||
--75.26.5.235 | |||
Can I make a suggestion please? Is there any way that this page can be done without needing 12000 images to be displayed? Even if that means using an alternate version of {{tl|pfrow}}. And btw, I tidied up the list that you made in your previous comment here. Please remember to sign all your comments with '''<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>''' and remember that registering has its benefits. --[[User:Lardarse|Lardarse]] 11:39, 18 February 2007 (EST) | |||
Doesn't [[Playing forever]] adequately describe the 4-celled-well patterns, at least for 7-bag? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 13:39, 18 February 2007 (EST) | |||
That article only describes a method of playing forever with the 7 given pieces. What [[Pattern Recognition]] aims for is optimal construction. Of course, that would mean 9-celled-well pattern recognition is the true goal, but that would be near impossible to document. (and what does that command do Lardarse? I'm a bit of a noob with code.)--DIGITAL | |||
pfrow is the wiki template that generates the diagrams. It displays a 10-wide grid of 10x10 images. What I'm suggesting is that someone makes a narrower version of it, to decrease server load and improve loading times. --[[User:Lardarse|Lardarse]] 02:30, 19 February 2007 (EST) | |||
:You don't have to be an admin to create and edit templates on this wiki. To see how to make a template, compare {{tl|pfrow}} to {{tl|tnetrow}}. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 12:04, 19 February 2007 (EST) | |||
There needs to be a way to properly caption the figures. In the page, the caption describes the picture below; this isn't obvious if you pay attention from the top. A divider of some sort would help[[User:128.163.239.233|128.163.239.233]] 13:35, 4 July 2007 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:00, 28 August 2019
i'm not sure what all of this means. could you detail what the article is about any? 72.150.62.175 21:30, 17 February 2007 (EST)
This is a work in progress that is not even close to being finished yet. Basically, I'm detailing construction patterns involving 3-celled wells, soon to include 4(this in no way seeks to exclude 5+ celled techniques, but rather complement them). This serves as a visual representation of what a player sees in their head while they are stacking. A fast player is often unaware of these images because they have acquired this skill through experience. It's purpose is to enable a player to see patterns in advance and the end result the moment they look at a playfield position and the upcoming next pieces.
The two figures in each diagram are mirrors of each other.
The only rules so far:
- No I pieces are to be used in any pattern.
- The patterns only take duplicate next pieces into mind. (Triplets are implausible in modern randomizers)
- No figures will lead to a 020 end pattern because that will force the usage of an I piece.
- No soft dropping.
--75.26.5.235
Can I make a suggestion please? Is there any way that this page can be done without needing 12000 images to be displayed? Even if that means using an alternate version of {{pfrow}}. And btw, I tidied up the list that you made in your previous comment here. Please remember to sign all your comments with ~~~~ and remember that registering has its benefits. --Lardarse 11:39, 18 February 2007 (EST)
Doesn't Playing forever adequately describe the 4-celled-well patterns, at least for 7-bag? --Tepples 13:39, 18 February 2007 (EST)
That article only describes a method of playing forever with the 7 given pieces. What Pattern Recognition aims for is optimal construction. Of course, that would mean 9-celled-well pattern recognition is the true goal, but that would be near impossible to document. (and what does that command do Lardarse? I'm a bit of a noob with code.)--DIGITAL
pfrow is the wiki template that generates the diagrams. It displays a 10-wide grid of 10x10 images. What I'm suggesting is that someone makes a narrower version of it, to decrease server load and improve loading times. --Lardarse 02:30, 19 February 2007 (EST)
- You don't have to be an admin to create and edit templates on this wiki. To see how to make a template, compare
{{pfrow}}to{{tnetrow}}. --Tepples 12:04, 19 February 2007 (EST)
There needs to be a way to properly caption the figures. In the page, the caption describes the picture below; this isn't obvious if you pay attention from the top. A divider of some sort would help128.163.239.233 13:35, 4 July 2007 (EDT)