Talk:Twists with S and Z: Difference between revisions
*>DIGITAL No edit summary |
*>DIGITAL No edit summary |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:OK... do {{tl|rotleft}} for {{rotleft}} and {{tl|rotright}} for {{rotright}} --[[User:Lardarse|Lardarse]] 14:29, 6 December 2007 (EST) | :OK... do {{tl|rotleft}} for {{rotleft}} and {{tl|rotright}} for {{rotright}} --[[User:Lardarse|Lardarse]] 14:29, 6 December 2007 (EST) | ||
What about [http://www.tetrisconcept.com/wiki/index.php?title=Image:Wiki_Symbols.png these]? Note that I might have included more symbols than we need just in case we find a use for them.--[[User:DIGITAL|DIGITAL]] 02:17, 7 December 2007 (EST) | What about [http://www.tetrisconcept.com/wiki/index.php?title=Image:Wiki_Symbols.png these]? Note that I might have included more symbols than we need just in case we find a use for them. Also note that initial actions can use a color swap. --[[User:DIGITAL|DIGITAL]] 02:17, 7 December 2007 (EST) |
Revision as of 07:20, 7 December 2007
Rotation names
"CW" and "CCW" are hard to read. While "rotate left" and "rotate right" are slightly misleading, they are probably better here. Other options would be welcomed. --Lardarse 07:39, 5 December 2007 (EST)
The CW/CCW substitution for right/left seems to be a subjective issue so I'll leave it as is until I have enough inputs to decide. --DIGITAL 19:59, 5 December 2007 (EST)
I agree that rotate left and right makes a lot more sense. Right and left are instinctive, so the reader automatically knows which way to go, but when he/she sees CW or CCW, first he must discern whether is has one or two C's, then he must (typically) visualize a clock ticking. That's my process anyway. Voting left/right here. Maybe "rotate leftward" is better? 66.157.54.221 21:55, 5 December 2007 (EST)
can i travel back in time if i don't like my piece placement? voting for CW/CCW --Jujubo 23:00, 5 December 2007 (EST)
or is something like this possible? --Jujubo 23:15, 5 December 2007 (EST) File:Sunglasses-emoticon-round.JPG
The image idea sounds like a streamlined system. It would remove the hassle of a textual interpretation and make more room for adding multiple notes/actions on a diagram. I was looking at this page and thought we could come up with something similar. --DIGITAL 01:17, 6 December 2007 (EST)
Perfect guide for a TAS! But yeah, vote images. --Lardarse 05:58, 6 December 2007 (EST)
- Ehh... not just for a TAS either. 0G ARS Movement Finesse anyone? --Lardarse 06:11, 6 December 2007 (EST)
The Lockjaw manual uses some glyphs from Unicode: ↰ (↰
) and ↱ (↱
). In theory, ↶ (↶
) and ↷ (↷
) would also work, but under vanilla XP at the font size that MediaWiki monobook uses, the arrowheads are hinted like crap. --tepples 11:28, 6 December 2007 (EST)
So make them bigger? ↰ ↱ ← → ⇤ ⇥ ↓ Revoking my "rotate left/right" vote, voting now for text symbols. 66.157.54.221 12:05, 6 December 2007 (EST)
↶ ↷ - Let's try that... --Lardarse 14:24, 6 December 2007 (EST)
What about these? Note that I might have included more symbols than we need just in case we find a use for them. Also note that initial actions can use a color swap. --DIGITAL 02:17, 7 December 2007 (EST)