Talk:Twists with S and Z: Difference between revisions
*>Jujubo example pic |
*>DIGITAL No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
or is something like [http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xmlcharent/glyphs/100dpi/U21BB.png this] possible? --[[User:Jujubo|Jujubo]] 23:15, 5 December 2007 (EST) | or is something like [http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xmlcharent/glyphs/100dpi/U21BB.png this] possible? --[[User:Jujubo|Jujubo]] 23:15, 5 December 2007 (EST) | ||
[[Image:Sunglasses-emoticon-round.JPG]] | [[Image:Sunglasses-emoticon-round.JPG]] | ||
The image idea sounds like a streamlined system. It would remove the hassle of a textual interpretation and make more room for adding multiple notes/actions on a diagram. I was looking at this [http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley-SanJose/4825/tet/rapid_idx.htm page] and thought we could come up with something similar. --[[User:DIGITAL|DIGITAL]] 01:17, 6 December 2007 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 06:17, 6 December 2007
Rotation names
"CW" and "CCW" are hard to read. While "rotate left" and "rotate right" are slightly misleading, they are probably better here. Other options would be welcomed. --Lardarse 07:39, 5 December 2007 (EST)
The CW/CCW substitution for right/left seems to be a subjective issue so I'll leave it as is until I have enough inputs to decide. --DIGITAL 19:59, 5 December 2007 (EST)
I agree that rotate left and right makes a lot more sense. Right and left are instinctive, so the reader automatically knows which way to go, but when he/she sees CW or CCW, first he must discern whether is has one or two C's, then he must (typically) visualize a clock ticking. That's my process anyway. Voting left/right here. Maybe "rotate leftward" is better? 66.157.54.221 21:55, 5 December 2007 (EST)
can i travel back in time if i don't like my piece placement? voting for CW/CCW --Jujubo 23:00, 5 December 2007 (EST)
or is something like this possible? --Jujubo 23:15, 5 December 2007 (EST) File:Sunglasses-emoticon-round.JPG
The image idea sounds like a streamlined system. It would remove the hassle of a textual interpretation and make more room for adding multiple notes/actions on a diagram. I was looking at this page and thought we could come up with something similar. --DIGITAL 01:17, 6 December 2007 (EST)