Talk:4-wide construction patterns: Difference between revisions

From TetrisWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m Simonlc moved page Talk:Pattern Recognition to Talk:4-wide construction patterns: The page was never finished and this makes more sense for the current content, it's also still useful so not worth deleting.
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:


The only rules so far:
The only rules so far:
1. No I pieces are to be used in any pattern.
#No I pieces are to be used in any pattern.
2. The patterns only take duplicate next pieces into mind. (Triplets are implausible in modern randomizers)
#The patterns only take duplicate next pieces into mind. (Triplets are implausible in modern randomizers)
3. No figures will lead to a 020 end pattern because that will force the usage of an I piece.
#No figures will lead to a 020 end pattern because that will force the usage of an I piece.
4. No soft dropping.
#No soft dropping.
--75.26.5.235
 
Can I make a suggestion please? Is there any way that this page can be done without needing 12000 images to be displayed? Even if that means using an alternate version of {{tl|pfrow}}. And btw, I tidied up the list that you made in your previous comment here. Please remember to sign all your comments with '''<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>''' and remember that registering has its benefits. --[[User:Lardarse|Lardarse]] 11:39, 18 February 2007 (EST)
 
Doesn't [[Playing forever]] adequately describe the 4-celled-well patterns, at least for 7-bag? --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 13:39, 18 February 2007 (EST)
 
That article only describes a method of playing forever with the 7 given pieces. What [[Pattern Recognition]] aims for is optimal construction. Of course, that would mean 9-celled-well pattern recognition is the true goal, but that would be near impossible to document. (and what does that command do Lardarse? I'm a bit of a noob with code.)--DIGITAL
 
pfrow is the wiki template that generates the diagrams. It displays a 10-wide grid of 10x10 images. What I'm suggesting is that someone makes a narrower version of it, to decrease server load and improve loading times. --[[User:Lardarse|Lardarse]] 02:30, 19 February 2007 (EST)
 
:You don't have to be an admin to create and edit templates on this wiki. To see how to make a template, compare {{tl|pfrow}} to {{tl|tnetrow}}. --[[User:Tepples|Tepples]] 12:04, 19 February 2007 (EST)
 
There needs to be a way to properly caption the figures.  In the page, the caption describes the picture below; this isn't obvious if you pay attention from the top. A divider of some sort would help[[User:128.163.239.233|128.163.239.233]] 13:35, 4 July 2007 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 13:00, 28 August 2019

i'm not sure what all of this means. could you detail what the article is about any? 72.150.62.175 21:30, 17 February 2007 (EST)

This is a work in progress that is not even close to being finished yet. Basically, I'm detailing construction patterns involving 3-celled wells, soon to include 4(this in no way seeks to exclude 5+ celled techniques, but rather complement them). This serves as a visual representation of what a player sees in their head while they are stacking. A fast player is often unaware of these images because they have acquired this skill through experience. It's purpose is to enable a player to see patterns in advance and the end result the moment they look at a playfield position and the upcoming next pieces.

The two figures in each diagram are mirrors of each other.

The only rules so far:

  1. No I pieces are to be used in any pattern.
  2. The patterns only take duplicate next pieces into mind. (Triplets are implausible in modern randomizers)
  3. No figures will lead to a 020 end pattern because that will force the usage of an I piece.
  4. No soft dropping.

--75.26.5.235

Can I make a suggestion please? Is there any way that this page can be done without needing 12000 images to be displayed? Even if that means using an alternate version of {{pfrow}}. And btw, I tidied up the list that you made in your previous comment here. Please remember to sign all your comments with ~~~~ and remember that registering has its benefits. --Lardarse 11:39, 18 February 2007 (EST)

Doesn't Playing forever adequately describe the 4-celled-well patterns, at least for 7-bag? --Tepples 13:39, 18 February 2007 (EST)

That article only describes a method of playing forever with the 7 given pieces. What Pattern Recognition aims for is optimal construction. Of course, that would mean 9-celled-well pattern recognition is the true goal, but that would be near impossible to document. (and what does that command do Lardarse? I'm a bit of a noob with code.)--DIGITAL

pfrow is the wiki template that generates the diagrams. It displays a 10-wide grid of 10x10 images. What I'm suggesting is that someone makes a narrower version of it, to decrease server load and improve loading times. --Lardarse 02:30, 19 February 2007 (EST)

You don't have to be an admin to create and edit templates on this wiki. To see how to make a template, compare {{pfrow}} to {{tnetrow}}. --Tepples 12:04, 19 February 2007 (EST)

There needs to be a way to properly caption the figures. In the page, the caption describes the picture below; this isn't obvious if you pay attention from the top. A divider of some sort would help128.163.239.233 13:35, 4 July 2007 (EDT)